Economy | Europe
The Great Retirement Crisis — What Happens When a Generation Can't Stop Working
Millions of Baby Boomers are working past 65 because they can't afford not to. Here is the specific economic and demographic failure that produced this — and what it means for younger workers.
Millions of Baby Boomers are working past 65 because they can't afford not to. Here is the specific economic and demographic failure that produced this — and what it means for younger workers.
- Millions of Baby Boomers are working past 65 because they can't afford not to.
- The retirement crisis affecting Baby Boomers in the United States — approximately half of Americans aged 55-64 have less than $50,000 in retirement savings, and the median retirement savings across all pre-retirement age...
- The structural causes of retirement savings inadequacy are specific and documented: the shift from defined benefit pensions (which provided guaranteed retirement income based on years of service and final salary) to defi...
Millions of Baby Boomers are working past 65 because they can't afford not to.
The retirement crisis affecting Baby Boomers in the United States — approximately half of Americans aged 55-64 have less than $50,000 in retirement savings, and the median retirement savings across all pre-retirement age groups fall dramatically short of the amounts actuaries calculate as necessary to sustain pre-retirement consumption — is producing a specific labour market dynamic: older workers remaining in the workforce longer than previous generations, both because they cannot afford to retire and because longer life expectancy and better health make continued work practically possible.
The structural causes of retirement savings inadequacy are specific and documented: the shift from defined benefit pensions (which provided guaranteed retirement income based on years of service and final salary) to defined contribution plans (401(k)s and IRAs, which place investment and savings responsibility on the individual) was implemented in the 1980s and 1990s without adequate transition provisions for workers whose careers began under defined benefit assumptions. Simultaneously, stagnating real wages for middle-income workers meant that the saving rates required for defined contribution adequacy were out of reach for a significant proportion of the workforce.
For the labour market consequences: older workers remaining longer in positions that younger workers expected to access through normal career progression creates specific tension at the career ladder interface. The specific jobs most affected are mid-career professional positions where Boomer continuation and Millennial promotion ambitions conflict most directly.
For the macroeconomic consequences: a generation that cannot retire and therefore cannot spend accumulated savings as consumer demand creates a specific drag on the consumption-driven economic growth model that developed economies have relied on during previous cohort transitions from work to retirement. The demographic arithmetic — the Baby Boom cohort is the largest in American history — magnifies this effect.