Science | Europe
The Specific Mental Health Benefits of Being in Nature — and Why Cities Are Building More of It
Research shows 120 minutes per week in nature significantly improves mental health. Here is the specific biology behind nature's effects and why cities are now legislating green space.
Research shows 120 minutes per week in nature significantly improves mental health. Here is the specific biology behind nature's effects and why cities are now legislating green space.
- Research shows 120 minutes per week in nature significantly improves mental health.
- The epidemiology of nature exposure and mental health has produced findings specific enough to generate policy recommendations: the 'two hours per week' threshold — below which mental health benefits of nature exposure a...
- The biological mechanisms proposed to explain nature's mental health effects are multiple and not mutually exclusive.
Research shows 120 minutes per week in nature significantly improves mental health.
The epidemiology of nature exposure and mental health has produced findings specific enough to generate policy recommendations: the 'two hours per week' threshold — below which mental health benefits of nature exposure are minimal and above which they are significant — comes from a 2019 analysis of 20,000 English adults that showed the specific dose-response relationship between weekly nature exposure and self-reported health and wellbeing.
The biological mechanisms proposed to explain nature's mental health effects are multiple and not mutually exclusive. Attention restoration theory proposes that directed attention — the cognitive resource required for urban navigation, task performance, and social interaction — is restored by nature environments whose 'soft fascination' (the rustle of leaves, the movement of water, the patterns of clouds) draws attention without requiring the effortful engagement that directed tasks require. The specific brain imaging evidence: amygdala activity (associated with threat and stress processing) is reduced after walks in natural rather than urban environments, even in people who report equivalent mood in both settings.
Phytoncides — volatile organic compounds released by trees and plants — have been shown in Japanese 'forest bathing' research to reduce cortisol, lower blood pressure, and increase natural killer cell activity (a measure of immune function) in people who spend time in forests. The specific compounds include terpenes and other secondary plant metabolites whose biological activity in mammals may reflect their evolutionary function as antimicrobial and antipredator defences.
For urban policy: cities are increasingly treating green space as health infrastructure rather than aesthetic amenity. Singapore's '1km from a park' policy guarantees access to green space within walking distance of every residence. New York City's urban greening programme has shown measurable improvements in stress and mental health indicators in neighbourhoods where tree canopy has been increased. Barcelona's 'superblocks' programme — restricting car access in specific blocks and converting the freed space to pedestrian areas and green space — has shown measurable air quality and public health improvements in evaluation data.
For the individual: the 120 minutes per week threshold is achievable in most urban environments and has the specific advantage of being free, accessible without medical referral, and producible by multiple different activities — walking, gardening, outdoor exercise, or simply sitting in a park.