Military | Europe
Trump Said 'Me and the Ayatollah' Could Jointly Control Hormuz — Here Is the Context
Trump suggested he and Iran's Supreme Leader could jointly control the Strait of Hormuz. Here is the full quote, the diplomatic context, and whether this is actually a viable proposal.
Trump suggested he and Iran's Supreme Leader could jointly control the Strait of Hormuz. Here is the full quote, the diplomatic context, and whether this is actually a viable proposal.
- Trump suggested he and Iran's Supreme Leader could jointly control the Strait of Hormuz.
- President Trump's specific statement that the Strait of Hormuz could be controlled 'jointly by me and the ayatollah' — confirmed in CNBC's Iran war coverage — is the particular diplomatic formulation that simultaneously...
- For the specific proposal's context: Trump's statement arrived in the specific window of the April 1-7 period when the 48-hour ultimatum was running, the back-channel negotiations through Pakistan were active, and his sp...
Trump suggested he and Iran's Supreme Leader could jointly control the Strait of Hormuz.
President Trump's specific statement that the Strait of Hormuz could be controlled 'jointly by me and the ayatollah' — confirmed in CNBC's Iran war coverage — is the particular diplomatic formulation that simultaneously reveals the specific creative deal-making approach that Trump's negotiating philosophy produces and the particular international law challenges that make joint control a more complex arrangement than the simple phrase implies.
For the specific proposal's context: Trump's statement arrived in the specific window of the April 1-7 period when the 48-hour ultimatum was running, the back-channel negotiations through Pakistan were active, and his specific public communications were oscillating between maximum threat ('stone ages') and unusual openness to creative resolution ('me and the ayatollah').
For what joint control would specifically require: the Strait of Hormuz's legal status under UNCLOS creates the particular framework that 'joint control' must navigate. The strait is both international waters and territorial waters of Iran and Oman simultaneously — a specific geographic feature whose legal status requires the particular international agreement framework that a Trump-Khamenei bilateral 'joint control' arrangement would need to formalize through the specific UN Law of the Sea treaty mechanisms.
For Iran's specific response: Iran's five-point ceasefire counteroffer specifically demanded that Iranian 'sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz is and will remain Iran's natural and legal right' — the particular claim that is the direct opposite of 'joint control.' Whether Iran's specific five-point conditions leave any room for the particular 'me and the ayatollah' arrangement is the specific diplomatic question that the back-channel apparently addresses.
For Trump's negotiating style's specific application: the particular creativity of suggesting a joint control arrangement that no previous US president would have considered is precisely the specific deal-making approach that Trump's specific negotiating philosophy — exploring unconventional structures rather than defaulting to conventional diplomatic frameworks — produces when the conventional options appear to have stalled.